त्रिवर्गमूलनिश्चयः — Determining the Roots of Dharma, Artha, and Kāma
Mahābhārata, Śānti-parva 123
अतः मैं आपसे यह जानना चाहता हूँ कि दण्डकी उत्पत्ति कैसे हुई? इसके पहले कौन-सी वस्तु जागरूक थी? तथा इस दण्डको सबसे उत्कृष्ट क्यों कहा जाता है? ।।
ataḥ mayā āpase idaṁ jñātum icchāmi—daṇḍakī utpattiḥ kathaṁ jātā? etat pūrvaṁ kā vastu jāgarūkā āsīt? tathā ca kasmād ayaṁ daṇḍaḥ sarvottama iti kathyate? kathaṁ kṣatriya-saṁsthaś ca daṇḍaḥ sampraty avasthitaḥ? brūhi me, sumahāprājña; dadāmi ācārya-vetanam.
「ゆえに私は汝から学びたい。ダンダ(daṇḍa)という刑罰の原理はいかにして最初に起こったのか。生ずる以前、最も早く目覚めて働いていたものは何か。なぜこのダンダが最上と讃えられるのか。さらに、この刑罰権がいかにして今、クシャトリヤ(Kṣatriya)の手に帰したのかも告げよ。大いなる智者よ、すべてを私に説き明かしてくれ。教えの報いとして、師への謝礼(guru-dakṣiṇā)を捧げよう。」
भीष्म उवाच
The verse frames daṇḍa (punitive authority) as a foundational instrument of rājadharma: it has an origin, a prior principle that ‘awakens’ before it, and a reason it is called supreme. It also highlights that daṇḍa is institutionally entrusted to the Kṣatriya ruler, implying that justice and coercion must be grounded in wisdom and dharma, not mere force.
Bhīṣma, in the Śānti Parva’s instruction on governance and ethics, poses (or relays) a set of questions seeking a doctrinal account of how daṇḍa originated, what preceded it, why it is praised as best, and how it came to be placed in the hands of Kṣatriyas—offering an ācārya-vetana as a formal gesture of discipleship and respect for teaching.