Śalya’s Objection to Sārathya and Duryodhana’s Conciliation (शल्यमन्यु-प्रशमनम् / Sārathyāṅgīkāra)
अथान्यद् धनुरादाय हेमपृष्ठं दुरासदम् । कर्ण विव्याध सप्तत्या सारथिं च त्रिभि: शरै:,तत्पश्चात् नकुलने सोनेकी पीठवाला दूसरा दुर्जय धनुष हाथमें लेकर कर्णको सत्तर और उसके सारथिको तीन बाणोंसे घायल कर दिया
athānyad dhanur ādāya hemapṛṣṭhaṃ durāsadam | karṇaṃ vivyādha saptatyā sārathiṃ ca tribhiḥ śaraiḥ ||
サञ्जयは言った。ついでナクラは、金の背を持ち抗しがたい別の弓を取り、カルナを七十の矢で射抜き、さらにカルナの御者を三矢で打った。
संजय उवाच
The verse highlights kṣatriya-dharma in its stark battlefield form: steadfastness, technical mastery, and decisive action. It also invites reflection on the ethical tension of war—skill and duty operating within a violent arena where even attendants like charioteers become targets.
In Sañjaya’s report of the battle, Nakula takes up another formidable, gold-backed bow and shoots Karṇa with seventy arrows, then wounds Karṇa’s charioteer with three arrows, intensifying the exchange between the warriors.