Shloka 20
Varṇasaṃkara: Causes, Classifications, and Conduct-based Recognition (वर्णसंकरः—हेतु-जाति-आचारनिर्णयः)
आर्षे गोमिथुनं शुल्क केचिदाहुर्मुषैव तत् । अल्पो वा बहु वा राजन् विक्रयस्तावदेव स:
ārṣe gomithunaṁ śulkaṁ kecid āhur muṣaiva tat | alpo vā bahu vā rājan vikrayas tāvad eva saḥ ||
ビーシュマは言った。「王よ、アールシャ（Ārṣa）の婚姻では、定められた婚資として雌牛一頭と雄牛一頭の一対を受け取るのだ、と言う者がいる。だがそれは真に誤った見解である。支払いが少なかろうと多かろうと同じこと—娘を売ることにほかならぬ。」
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
Bhīṣma teaches that taking any payment as a condition of marriage—whether small or large—turns the act into a ‘sale’ (vikraya) of the bride, and is therefore ethically and dharmically objectionable, even if some try to justify it under the label of Ārṣa marriage.
In the Anuśāsana Parva’s dharma-instruction, Bhīṣma addresses the king (Yudhiṣṭhira) and clarifies a disputed point about the Ārṣa form of marriage: he rejects the idea that giving a cow and bull as ‘śulka’ is a valid prescription, arguing that it effectively constitutes commercialization of the maiden.