प्रलय-तत्त्वलयः, नीललोहित-रुद्रः, अष्टमूर्तिस्तवः, एवं ब्रह्मणो वैराग्यम्
सर्वांस्तानग्रजान्दृष्ट्वा भूतप्रेतनिशाचरान् अनिन्दत तदा देवो ब्रह्मात्मानम् अजो विभुः
sarvāṃstānagrajāndṛṣṭvā bhūtapretaniśācarān anindata tadā devo brahmātmānam ajo vibhuḥ
それら先なる存在――ブータ、プレータ、そして夜にさまよう霊たち――をことごとく見て、天なるブラフマーは、不生にして遍満なる者として、自らを責め、顕現の連なりにおける己が過失を悟った。
Suta Goswami (narrating the episode; internal focus on Brahma’s reaction)
It frames the need for Pati (Śiva) as the regulating Lord of manifestation: when lower, tamasic forces appear in sṛṣṭi, the remedy is turning toward Śiva-tattva and Śiva-pūjā for order, protection, and purification.
By showing Brahmā’s limitation and self-reproach, it implicitly points to Śiva as Pati beyond the defects of conditioned creation—the supreme governor who alone can bind, release, and harmonize pashus amid pasha-born disturbances.
The takeaway aligns with Pāśupata discipline: confronting tamas (fear, impurity, chaotic forces) through Śiva-smaraṇa, protective rites, and inner restraint—seeking Śiva’s mastery over bhūta-preta influences rather than reacting with aversion.