Shloka 7
Nārada Instructs Dakṣa’s Sons; Allegory of the World; Dakṣa Curses Nārada
उवाच चाथ हर्यश्वा: कथं स्रक्ष्यथ वै प्रजा: । अदृष्ट्वान्तं भुवो यूयं बालिशा बत पालका: ॥ ६ ॥ तथैकपुरुषं राष्ट्रं बिलं चादृष्टनिर्गमम् । बहुरूपां स्त्रियं चापि पुमांसं पुंश्चलीपतिम् ॥ ७ ॥ नदीमुभयतो वाहां पञ्चपञ्चाद्भुतं गृहम् । क्वचिद्धंसं चित्रकथं क्षौरपव्यं स्वयं भ्रमि ॥ ८ ॥
uvāca cātha haryaśvāḥ kathaṁ srakṣyatha vai prajāḥ adṛṣṭvāntaṁ bhuvo yūyaṁ bāliśā bata pālakāḥ
大聖ナーラダは言った。「愛しきハリヤシュヴァたちよ、汝らは大地の果てを見ていない。ゆえに汝らは未熟な少年である。ある国にはただ一人の男が住み、また入れば誰も出て来ぬ穴がある。そこには極めて不貞な女が、さまざまに魅惑の装いで身を飾り、その国の唯一の男が彼女の夫である。そこには両方へ流れる川があり、二十五の要素から成る不思議な家があり、種々の音を発する白鳥があり、剃刀の刃と金剛（ヴァジュラ）のごとく鋭く堅いものから成って自ら回転する器具もある。これらを見ぬ汝らが、どうして子孫を生み出せようか。」
Nārada Muni saw that the boys known as the Haryaśvas were already purified because of living in that holy place and were practically ready for liberation. Why then should they be encouraged to become entangled in family life, which is so dark that once having entered it one cannot leave it? Through this analogy, Nārada Muni asked them to consider why they should follow their father’s order to be entangled in family life. Indirectly, he asked them to find within the cores of their hearts the situation of the Supersoul, Lord Viṣṇu, for then they would truly be experienced. In other words, one who is too involved in his material environment and does not look within the core of his heart is increasingly entangled in the illusory energy. Nārada Muni’s purpose was to get the sons of Prajāpati Dakṣa to divert their attention toward spiritual realization instead of involving themselves in the ordinary but complicated affairs of propagation. The same advice was given by Prahlāda Mahārāja to his father ( Bhāg. 7.5.5 ):
FAQs
The verse presents riddle-like symbols (kingdom, cave, many-formed woman, two-way river, “house of five times five,” swan, razor’s edge) to point beyond literal worldly life toward subtle truths of material entanglement and the difficult path of spiritual realization.
After receiving Narada Muni’s instruction, the Haryaśvas became detached from material procreation and questioned the very premise of worldly expansion, implying that without knowing life’s ultimate end, ordinary “guardianship” and worldly duty can be naive.
It encourages self-inquiry before rushing into life’s expansions—reflecting on purpose, impermanence, and the “razor’s edge” discipline needed for genuine spiritual progress.