Shloka 14

धर्मोपघातकस्त्वेष समारम्भस्तव प्रभो । नायं धर्मकृतो यज्ञो न हिंसा धर्म उच्यते,'प्रभो! आपने जो यज्ञका समारम्भ किया है, यह धर्मको हानि पहुँचानेवाला है। यह यज्ञ धर्मके अनुकूल नहीं है, क्योंकि हिंसाको कहीं भी धर्म नहीं कहा गया है

dharma-upaghātakas tveṣa samārambhas tava prabho | nāyaṃ dharma-kṛto yajño na hiṃsā dharma ucyate ||

Vaiśaṃpāyana said: “O lord, this undertaking of yours harms dharma. This sacrifice is not performed in accordance with righteousness, for violence is nowhere declared to be dharma.”

धर्मोपघातकःharmful to dharma; destroyer of righteousness
धर्मोपघातकः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootधर्म-उपघातक
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
तुbut/indeed
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
एषःthis
एषः:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootएतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
समारम्भःundertaking; commencement
समारम्भः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootसमारम्भ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
तवof you; your
तव:
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
FormGenitive, Singular
प्रभोO lord
प्रभो:
TypeNoun
Rootप्रभु
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अयम्this
अयम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
धर्मकृतःdone for dharma; righteous (in purpose)
धर्मकृतः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootधर्मकृत्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
यज्ञःsacrifice; yajña
यज्ञः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootयज्ञ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
हिंसाviolence; injury
हिंसा:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootहिंसा
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
धर्मःdharma; righteousness
धर्मः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootधर्म
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
उच्यतेis said; is called
उच्यते:
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
FormPresent, Passive, Third, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśaṃpāyana
Y
yajña

Educational Q&A

The verse asserts an ethical principle: an act that harms dharma cannot be justified as dharma, and violence (hiṃsā) is not to be labeled righteousness—especially when presented under the guise of a sacrificial rite.

The narrator reports a moral objection raised against a sacrificial undertaking: the speaker addresses a ‘lord’ and challenges the legitimacy of the yajña on ethical grounds, arguing that its violent aspect makes it contrary to dharma.