Shloka 133
यथा द्रव्यं च कर्ता च संयोगो5प्यनयोस्तथा । यह निश्चित बात है कि पुरुषके भोगनेयोग्य द्रव्यमात्रकी संज्ञा सत्त्व है तथा जैसे द्रव्य और कर्ताका सम्बन्ध है, वैसे ही इन दोनोंका सम्बन्ध है
yathā dravyaṃ ca kartā ca saṃyogo ’py anayostathā |
Vāyu said: “Just as there is a conjunction between a material object and the agent who acts, so too is there a conjunction between these two.” In context, the statement clarifies a Sāṃkhya-like ethical discernment: what is ‘enjoyed’ (the objective field of experience) and the ‘enjoyer/agent’ are distinct in principle, yet appear bound together through association—an association that must be understood to loosen attachment and restore right understanding.
वायुदेव उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse teaches discernment between the objective ‘substance’ (what is experienced/used) and the ‘agent’ (the doer/enjoyer). Their bond is not identity but saṃyoga—an association—so one should not confuse the self with the field of objects or with mere material qualities.
Vāyudeva is instructing the listener in a philosophical explanation, using an analogy: as an agent relates to a material object through contact/association, so two principles under discussion are connected. The point is to clarify how apparent bondage arises and how right understanding supports ethical restraint and liberation-oriented conduct.