वाली–रामसंवादः
Rama’s Justification to Vali on Rājadharma
सुग्रीवेण च मे सख्यं लक्ष्मणेन यथा तथा।दारराज्यनिमित्तं च निःश्रेयसि रत स्स मे4.18.26।।प्रतिज्ञा च मया दत्ता तदा वानरसन्निधौ।प्रतिज्ञा च कथं शक्या मद्विधेनानवेक्षितुम्4.18.27।।
sugrīveṇa ca me sakhyaṃ lakṣmaṇena yathā tathā | dārarājyānimittaṃ ca niḥśreyasi rataś ca me (4.18.26) || pratijñā ca mayā dattā tadā vānarasannidhau | pratijñā ca kathaṃ śakyā madvidhenānavekṣitum (4.18.27) ||
Persahabatanku dengan Sugriva seteguh persahabatanku dengan Lakshmana; demi memulihkan istrinya dan kerajaannya, dan demi tujuan yang benar. Saat itu aku telah memberi pratijñā di hadapan para vānarā—bagaimana mungkin orang sepertiku mengabaikan janji?
'My friendship with Sugriva is as strong as that with Lakshmana. Its motive is the recovery of his wife and sovereignty. I have promised this to him in the presence of monkeys. How can a pledge remain unhonoured by a person like me? How is it possible?
The same dharma as 4.18.26: satya and pledge-keeping are non-negotiable, especially when undertaken for a just cause.
A repeated reading in the provided text reiterates Rama’s justification: he is bound by public promise to Sugriva.
Consistency and truthfulness: Rama’s commitment remains unwavering even under accusation.