धृष्टद्युम्नस्य द्रोणाभिमुख्यं तथा सात्यकि-कर्ण-समागमः
Dhṛṣṭadyumna’s advance toward Droṇa and the Sātyaki–Karṇa confrontation
चेष्टमानं प्रतीघाते सभुजं मां सचक्षुष:,मेरी बाँहें मौजूद हैं और मैं अपने ऊपर किये गये आघातका बदला लेनेकी निरन्तर चेष्टा करता आया हूँ तो भी तुमलोग आँख रहते हुए भी यदि मुझे मरा हुआ मान लेते हो, तो यह तुम्हारी बुद्धिकी मन्दताका परिचायक है। कुरुश्रेष्ठ वीरो! मैंने तो भूरिश्रवाका वध करके बदला चुकाया है, जो सर्वथा उचित है
ceṣṭamānaṁ pratīghāte sabhujaṁ māṁ sacakṣuḥ, merī bāṁheṁ maujūd haiṁ aura maiṁ apane ūpara kiye gaye āghāta kā badalā lene kī nirantara ceṣṭā karatā āyā hūṁ to bhī tumalog āṁkha rahate hue bhī yadi mujhe marā huā māna lete ho, to yaha tumhārī buddhikī mandatā kā paricāyaka hai. kuruśreṣṭha vīro! maiṁne to bhūriśravā kā vadha karake badalā cukāyā hai, jo sarvathā ucita hai
Sañjaya berkata: “Lenganku masih ada, dan aku terus berusaha membalas pukulan yang ditimpakan kepadaku. Namun jika kalian, meski bermata, tetap menganggapku sudah mati, itu hanya menyingkap kedunguan penilaian kalian. Wahai para pahlawan utama Kuru! Dengan membunuh Bhūriśravas aku telah menuntaskan pembalasanku—dan menurutku itu sepenuhnya patut.”
संजय उवाच
The passage frames retaliation as a claim to restored honor: the speaker argues that being alive and capable, he has repaid an injury through the killing of Bhūriśravas, presenting this as ‘proper.’ It highlights the Mahābhārata’s recurring tension between personal vengeance and ethical justification in war.
Sanjaya reports a warrior’s defiant assertion: despite having suffered an attack, he is not ‘as good as dead’—his arms remain, he has kept striving to answer the injury, and he declares that he has already settled the score by slaying Bhūriśravas.