HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 6Shloka 32
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 32

Dhyana YogaAtma Samyama Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 32 illustration

आत्मौपम्येन सर्वत्र समं पश्यति योऽर्जुन । सुखं वा यदि वा दुःखं स योगी परमो मतः ॥ ६.३२ ॥

ātmaupamyena sarvatra samaṁ paśyati yo 'rjuna | sukhaṁ vā yadi vā duḥkhaṁ sa yogī paramo mataḥ || 6.32 ||

Wahai Arjuna, ia yang melihat kesetaraan di mana-mana dengan membandingkan pada dirinya sendiri—baik dalam suka maupun duka—yogi itu dianggap yang tertinggi.

O Arjuna, he is deemed the supreme yogin who sees equality everywhere by comparison with himself, whether in pleasure or pain.

That yogin is considered highest who, by analogy with himself, sees sameness everywhere—whether (others experience) happiness or suffering.

Traditional translations often take this as an ethical directive grounded in empathy (‘as oneself’). Some commentarial traditions connect it to metaphysical sameness (one Self), but the explicit ‘by comparison with oneself’ foregrounds a practical moral-psychological method.

आत्मौपम्येनby the analogy/comparison with oneself
आत्मौपम्येन:
करण
Rootआत्मौपम्य
सर्वत्रeverywhere; in all cases/with all beings
सर्वत्र:
अधिकारण
Rootसर्वत्र
समम्equally; with sameness
समम्:
Rootसम
पश्यतिsees; regards
पश्यति:
Root√पश् (दृश्)
यःwho
यः:
कर्ता
Rootयद्
अर्जुनO Arjuna
अर्जुन:
Rootअर्जुन
सुखम्happiness; pleasure
सुखम्:
कर्म
Rootसुख
वाor
वा:
Rootवा
यदिif
यदि:
Rootयदि
वाor
वा:
Rootवा
दुःखम्sorrow; pain
दुःखम्:
कर्म
Rootदुःख
सःhe
सः:
कर्ता
Rootतद्
योगीa yogi; one established in yoga
योगी:
कर्ता
Rootयोगिन्
परमःsupreme; highest
परमः:
कर्ता
Rootपरम
मतःis considered; is held to be
मतः:
Root√मन् (मत)
Krishna
Ātmaupamya (self-analogy)Sama-darśana (equanimity/equality)DuḥkhaEthical cultivation
Empathy as yogic criterionMoral extension of self-understandingEquanimity toward pleasure/painHighest attainment as ethical perception

FAQs

The method ‘by analogy with oneself’ describes perspective-taking: using one’s own sensitivity to pleasure and distress as a guide for understanding others, supporting compassion and restraint.

While it can align with doctrines of one Self, the verse’s explicit framing supports a moral phenomenology: shared capacity for happiness and suffering becomes the basis for ‘sameness’ in regard.

After describing yogic realization and divine immanence, the chapter identifies a concrete marker of yogic excellence: impartial, empathic perception in lived relations.

It parallels contemporary ethics of reciprocity: treat others’ well-being as comparable to one’s own, informing non-harm, fairness, and compassionate action.