Bhīṣma’s Counsel on Reconciliation and Partition (भीष्मोपदेशः—संधि-राज्यविभागविचारः)
यथायं विहितो धर्मो यतश्चायं सनातन: । यथा च प्राह कौन्तेयस्तथा धर्मो न संशय:
yathāyaṁ vihito dharmo yataścāyaṁ sanātanaḥ | yathā ca prāha kaunteyastathā dharmo na saṁśayaḥ ||
જેમ આ ધર્મ વિધિપૂર્વક નિર્ધારિત થયો છે, અને જે કારણથી તે સનાતન વ્યવસ્થાને અનુરૂપ છે, તેમજ કુંતીપુત્રે જેમ તેનું પ્રતિપાદન કર્યું છે—તેમ નિઃસંદેહ આ જ ધર્મ છે.
व्यास उवाच
That an action is to be accepted as dharma when it is both scripturally/authoritatively enjoined (vihita) and consistent with the eternal moral order (sanātana), and when sound reasoning by a competent authority (here, Kaunteya) supports it—hence it is ‘without doubt’ dharma.
Vyāsa delivers a concluding validation: he affirms that the disputed practice—contextually, the propriety of a particular marriage arrangement—fits established injunctions and the eternal dharma, and that Yudhiṣṭhira’s defense of its dharma-compatibility is correct.