Shloka 29
Sati's Death & Virabhadra — Sati’s Death and the Assault on Daksha’s Sacrifice: Virabhadra versus the Devas
तावन्योन्यं महात्मानौ शरचापधरौ मुने रुधिरारुणसिक्ताङ्गौ किंशुकाविव रेजतुः
tāvanyonyaṃ mahātmānau śaracāpadharau mune rudhirāruṇasiktāṅgau kiṃśukāviva rejatuḥ
Ô sage, ces deux êtres magnanimes, portant arc et flèches, se faisaient face; leurs membres, trempés et rougis de sang, brillaient tels des arbres kiṃśuka.
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "raudra", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
Even in depictions of combat, the Purāṇic lens emphasizes stature (mahātman) and the moral frame behind action; the aestheticization of battle does not glorify cruelty so much as portray the intensity of dharma-conflict and its visible costs.
Carita/narrative description within a larger episode; it is not a pancalakṣaṇa core item but typical Purāṇic storytelling that supports dharma instruction through exempla.
The kiṃśuka (flame-of-the-forest) is emblematic of blazing redness; comparing blood-reddened bodies to kiṃśuka trees suggests a ‘forest of fire’ motif—conflict as a consuming blaze that arises when dharma and adharma collide.