Shloka 1
Draupadī-apaharaṇa-saṃdeśaḥ
Report of Draupadī’s Abduction and the Pāṇḍavas’ Pursuit
हि मय ० (0) है 7 द्विपज्चाशर्दाधिकद्विशततमो< ध्याय: सर्नेपर दुर्योधन धनको समझाना और कर्णके अनुरोध करनेपर दुयोधनका अनशन त्याग करके हस्तिनापुरको प्रस्थान दानवा ऊचु: भो: सुयोधन राजेन्द्र भरतानां कुलोद्वह । शूरै: परिवृतो नित्यं तथैव च महात्मभि:
vaiśaṃpāyana uvāca — dānavā ūcuḥ: bhoḥ suyodhana rājendra bharatānāṃ kulodvaha | śūraiḥ parivṛto nityaṃ tathaiva ca mahātmabhiḥ ||
Vaiśampāyana dit : Les Dānavas déclarèrent—«Ô Suyodhana, roi parmi les rois, soutien de la lignée des Bharata ! Tu es toujours entouré de héros et d’hommes à l’âme grande. Pourquoi donc as-tu osé entreprendre un jeûne jusqu’à la mort ? Celui qui se détruit lui-même tombe en un état inférieur, et dans le monde il ne récolte que le blâme—une honte qui répand la mauvaise renommée.»
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The passage frames self-destruction (or a death-fast undertaken in despair) as ethically blameworthy: it leads to a ‘lower state’ and public censure. For a king charged with upholding a lineage, endurance and responsible action are presented as superior to self-harm motivated by frustration or wounded pride.
In Vana Parva, Adhyaya 253, the Dānavas address Duryodhana (Suyodhana). Noting that he is supported by brave and noble allies, they question why he attempted an ‘āmarana’ fast (fasting unto death) and warn him about the disgrace and negative consequences associated with self-killing.