Shloka 182
Śuka’s Guṇa-Transcendence and Vyāsa’s Consolation (शुकगति-वर्णनम्)
पृथक्त्वादाश्रमाणां च वर्णन्यत्वे तथैव च । परस्परपृथक्त्वाच्च कथं ते वर्णसंकर:
pṛthaktvād āśramāṇāṁ ca varṇānyatve tathaiva ca | paraspara-pṛthaktvāc ca kathaṁ te varṇa-saṅkaraḥ ||
Bhīṣma dit : «Puisque les āśrama sont distincts les uns des autres, et que de même les quatre varṇa diffèrent, et puisqu’il existe entre eux une séparation réciproque, comment une “confusion des varṇa” pourrait-elle naître pour toi qui comprends leur distinction ? Si leurs limites sont maintenues, sur quel fondement pourrait-on alléguer un trouble de l’ordre social et moral ?»
भीष्य उवाच
Educational Q&A
Bhīṣma argues that when āśramas and varṇas are clearly distinguished and their boundaries are understood, the claim of inevitable varṇa-saṅkara (social/ethical confusion through intermixture) lacks basis; the point is to ground social-ethical anxieties in careful reasoning rather than assumption.
In the Śānti Parva’s dharma-discourse, Bhīṣma addresses a concern about varṇa-saṅkara and challenges it by pointing to the conceptual and practical separations between āśramas and varṇas, pressing the interlocutor to justify how ‘mixing’ could occur if distinctions are maintained.