Śakra–Namuci-saṃvāda: Śoka-nivāraṇa and Daiva-vicāra
Indra and Namuci on grief, composure, and inevitability
एतदाहुः समाहार क्षेत्रमध्यात्मचिन्तका: । स्थितो मनसि यो भाव: स वै क्षेत्रज्ञ उच्यते
etad āhuḥ samāhāraṃ kṣetram adhyātma-cintakāḥ | sthito manasi yo bhāvaḥ sa vai kṣetrajña ucyate ||
Bhīṣma dit : «Ceux qui méditent les vérités du Soi intérieur déclarent que l’agrégat—ce corps avec les sens—est le “champ” (kṣetra). Le principe conscient qui demeure dans le mental, la vigilance intérieure qui connaît et illumine l’expérience, est appelé le “connaisseur du champ” (kṣetrajña), le soi individuel.»
भीष्म उवाच
The verse distinguishes between the ‘field’ (kṣetra)—the composite of body and senses—and the ‘knower of the field’ (kṣetrajña)—the conscious principle that experiences and knows. Ethical clarity arises from not confusing the changing body-mind with the witnessing self.
In the Shanti Parva’s instruction on dharma and inner knowledge, Bhishma teaches Yudhishthira a philosophical framework: defining the body-sense complex as the arena of experience and identifying the indwelling consciousness as the true knower.