बलीन्द्रसंवादः — Kāla, Anityatā, and the Limits of Agency
Mahābhārata 12.217
प्रकृतेश्न विकाराणां द्रष्टारमगुणान्वितम् । अग्राह्मौ पुरुषावेतावलिड्रत्वादसंहतौ
prakṛteś ca vikārāṇāṁ draṣṭāram aguṇānvitam | agrāhyaṁ puruṣāv etāv aliṅgatvād asaṁhatau ||
Bhīṣma enseigne que le Soi (puruṣa) est le témoin des transformations de la nature (prakṛti), tout en demeurant au-delà des guṇa. Ni prakṛti ni puruṣa ne sont des objets saisissables par les sens : ils sont sans forme, subtils, et distincts l’un de l’autre. L’implication éthique est de cultiver le discernement entre le champ changeant de la nature et le témoin immuable, afin de desserrer l’attachement et de marcher vers la liberté intérieure.
भीष्म उवाच
Discriminate between prakṛti (the changing field of guṇas and modifications) and puruṣa (the formless, partless witness). Realizing the witness as beyond guṇas supports detachment and liberation-oriented conduct.
In the Śānti Parva’s instruction on peace and liberation, Bhīṣma teaches Yudhiṣṭhira a Sāṅkhya-style analysis: nature undergoes transformations, while the conscious principle remains the non-sensory witness, distinct from nature.