क्षुपदधीचिसंवादः — शिलादतपः, वरसीमा, मेघवाहनकल्पे त्रिदेवसमागमः
तदा तं कल्पमाहुर्वै मेघवाहनसंज्ञया हिरण्यगर्भस्तं दृष्ट्वा तस्य देहोद्भवस्तदा
tadā taṃ kalpamāhurvai meghavāhanasaṃjñayā hiraṇyagarbhastaṃ dṛṣṭvā tasya dehodbhavastadā
Alors, en vérité, cet éon fut proclamé sous le nom de « Meghavāhana ». Et Hiraṇyagarbha (Brahmā), l’ayant contemplé, naquit à cet instant même de Son corps, se manifestant comme le principe créateur sous le Seigneur (Pati).
Suta Goswami (narrating to the sages of Naimisharanya)
By naming a specific kalpa and showing the creator (Hiraṇyagarbha) as a dependent manifestation, the verse supports Linga-worship’s core view: Pati (Shiva) is the source, while all creative functions arise under His sovereignty.
Shiva-tattva is implied as the transcendent cause from whom even Brahmā’s creative principle emerges—indicating the Lord as Pati beyond the kalpa-cycle, with creation appearing as His ordered manifestation.
The takeaway aligns with Pāśupata discipline: contemplate the kalpa as transient (pāśa) and anchor the pashu (soul) in devotion and inward worship of Pati (Shiva), the source beyond cyclic creation.