Nimi Questions the Yogendras: Varṇāśrama’s Purpose, Ritualism’s Fall, and Yuga-Avatāras with Kali-yuga Saṅkīrtana
यद् घ्राणभक्षो विहित: सुराया- स्तथा पशोरालभनं न हिंसा । एवं व्यवाय: प्रजया न रत्या इमं विशुद्धं न विदु: स्वधर्मम् ॥ १३ ॥
yad ghrāṇa-bhakṣo vihitaḥ surāyās tathā paśor ālabhanaṁ na hiṁsā evaṁ vyavāyaḥ prajayā na ratyā imaṁ viśuddhaṁ na viduḥ sva-dharmam
Selon les injonctions védiques, le vin offert dans le sacrifice doit ensuite être goûté par l’odorat, non bu. De même, l’offrande d’animaux est permise, mais nullement l’abattage à grande échelle. La sexualité est admise dans le mariage pour engendrer, non pour la jouissance; pourtant les matérialistes peu intelligents ne comprennent pas ce devoir pur.
Madhvācārya has given the following statement in regard to animal sacrifice:
This verse states that sexual union (vyavāya) is meant to be regulated for producing children (prajā), not pursued merely for sensual enjoyment (rati).
It uses them as examples of regulated concessions: liquor is restricted for the addicted, and sacrificial animal offering is framed as ritual regulation rather than ordinary violence—illustrating that dharma purifies by control, not indulgence.
Adopt conscious regulation: avoid intoxication, reject cruelty, and treat sexuality responsibly—guided by duty, self-control, and spiritual purpose rather than impulse.