HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 14Shloka 3
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Gunatraya Vibhaga Yoga, Shloka 3

Gunatraya Vibhaga Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 3 illustration

मम योनिर्महद्ब्रह्म तस्मिन्गर्भं दधाम्यहम् । संभवः सर्वभूतानां ततो भवति भारत ॥ १४.३ ॥

mama yonir mahad brahma tasmin garbhaṃ dadhāmy aham | saṃbhavaḥ sarvabhūtānāṃ tato bhavati bhārata || 14.3 ||

Mon sein est le grand Brahman ; en lui je dépose la semence. De là naît l’origine de tous les êtres, ô Bhārata.

My womb is the great Brahman; in that I place the seed; from that arises the origin of all beings, O Bhārata.

The great brahman is my womb; in it I place the embryo/seed; from that comes the emergence of all beings, O Bhārata.

‘Mahad brahma’ is often interpreted as prakṛti or the cosmic principle (mahat) associated with Sāṃkhya cosmology. The verse uses generative imagery to express a theistic-cosmological relation between the divine and material nature.

ममof me; my
मम:
Rootअस्मद्
योनि:womb; source; matrix
योनि::
Rootयोनि
महत्great
महत्:
Rootमहत्
ब्रह्मBrahman; the Absolute; (here) the great Brahman (Prakṛti)
ब्रह्म:
Rootब्रह्मन्
तस्मिन्in that
तस्मिन्:
Adhikarana
Rootतद्
गर्भम्embryo; seed; germ
गर्भम्:
Karma
Rootगर्भ
दधामिI place; I deposit
दधामि:
Root√धा (दधाति)
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
संभवःorigin; coming-into-being
संभवः:
Rootसंभव
सर्वof all
सर्व:
Rootसर्व
भूतानाम्of beings; of creatures
भूतानाम्:
Rootभूत
ततःfrom that; thence
ततः:
Rootततः (तद्-तस्मात्)
भवतिarises; comes to be
भवति:
Root√भू
भारतO Bhārata (descendant of Bharata)
भारत:
Rootभारत
KrishnaArjuna
PrakṛtiMahat (cosmic intellect principle)Sṛṣṭi (emanation/creation)Īśvara (divine agency)
Cosmic generation imageryRelation of divine and material causeOrigin of embodied life

FAQs

By presenting life as arising from a larger order, the verse can encourage humility and a sense of belonging, countering isolating self-centered narratives.

It depicts a dual-causal model: material nature as the matrix (womb) and the divine as initiating principle, together accounting for the manifestation of beings.

It grounds the forthcoming discussion of guṇas in a cosmological account of how embodied existence arises within prakṛti under divine governance.

Interpreted broadly, it supports ecological and systemic thinking: individuals emerge within conditions not wholly self-created, inviting responsibility toward those conditions.