Shloka 16
Adhyaya 38 — Dattatreya on Non-Identification (Mamata) and the Path to Liberation
मशकोडुम्बरेषीकामुञ्जमत्स्याम्भसां यथा ।
एकत्वे 'पि पृथग्भावस्तथा क्षेत्रात्मनोर् नृप ! ॥
maśakoḍumbareṣīkāmuñjamatsyāmbhasāṃ yathā |
ekatve 'pi pṛthagbhāvastathā kṣetrātmanornṛpa ! ||
Así como hay separación entre un mosquito, el fruto udumbara, una caña/fibra, la hierba muñja, un pez y el agua—aunque se los mencione juntos—del mismo modo, oh rey, hay distinción entre el campo (kṣetra) y el Sí mismo (ātman).
{ "primaryRasa": "shanta", "secondaryRasa": "adbhuta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
Proximity or functional association does not imply identity; the Self remains distinct from the psycho-physical field even when they appear ‘together’ in experience.
Upadeśa (instruction) via dṛṣṭānta (analogy), outside the five hallmark categories.
The heterogeneous list emphasizes categorical difference: mixing in one ‘set’ is conceptual, not ontological—mirroring how ‘I’ is mistakenly bundled with body-mind under one label.