Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 17

Udyoga-parva Adhyāya 30: Sañjaya’s Departure and Yudhiṣṭhira’s Commission of Greetings

अथोचितं स्वकं भागं लभेमहि परंतप । निवर्तय परद्रव्याद्‌ बुद्धि गृद्धां नरर्षभ,“परंतप! परंतु अब हम अपना उचित भाग निश्चय ही लेंगे। नरश्रेष्ठ! तुम दूसरोंके धनसे अपनी लोभसयुक्त बुद्धि हटा लो

athocitaṃ svakaṃ bhāgaṃ labhemahi paraṃtapa | nivartaya paradravyād buddhiṃ gr̥ddhāṃ nararṣabha ||

«Oh, azote de enemigos, ahora sí obtendremos sin falta la parte que nos corresponde. Oh, el mejor de los hombres, aparta tu mente, movida por la codicia, de los bienes ajenos».

अथthen/now
अथ:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअथ
उचितम्proper, due
उचितम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootउचित
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
स्वकम्one's own
स्वकम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootस्वक
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
भागम्share, portion
भागम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootभाग
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
लभेमहिmay we obtain
लभेमहि:
TypeVerb
Rootलभ्
FormVidhi-linga, Optative, First, Plural, Atmanepada
परंतपO scorcher of foes
परंतप:
TypeNoun
Rootपरंतप
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
निवर्तयturn back, withdraw
निवर्तय:
TypeVerb
Rootनि-वृत्
FormLot, Imperative, Second, Singular, Parasmaipada
परद्रव्याद्from others' wealth/property
परद्रव्याद्:
Apadana
TypeNoun
Rootपरद्रव्य
FormNeuter, Ablative, Singular
बुद्धिम्mind, intention
बुद्धिम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootबुद्धि
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
गृद्धाम्greedy, covetous
गृद्धाम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootगृद्ध
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
नरर्षभO bull among men, O best of men
नरर्षभ:
TypeNoun
Rootनरर्षभ
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular

युधिछिर उवाच

Y
Yudhiṣṭhira

Educational Q&A

One should restrain covetousness toward others’ property and uphold dharma by seeking only one’s rightful due; greed (gr̥ddhā buddhi) is portrayed as ethically corrupting and socially destabilizing.

In the Udyoga Parva’s pre-war negotiations, Yudhiṣṭhira asserts the Pandavas’ claim to their legitimate share and admonishes the opposing side to abandon attachment to wealth that is not rightfully theirs, framing the dispute as a moral issue rather than mere power politics.