क्षुपस्य विष्णुदर्शनं, वैष्णवस्तोत्रं, दधीचविवादः, स्थानेश्वरतीर्थमाहात्म्यं
ततस्तस्य मुनेः श्रुत्वा वचनं कुपितो हरिः चक्रमुद्यम्य भगवान् दिधक्षुर्मुनिसत्तमम्
tatastasya muneḥ śrutvā vacanaṃ kupito hariḥ cakramudyamya bhagavān didhakṣurmunisattamam
Entonces, al oír las palabras de aquel sabio, el Señor Hari (Viṣṇu) se enfureció; alzando su disco, el Bienaventurado quiso abrasar al más excelso de los munis. Mas ese mismo arrebato de ira es una advertencia: aun el poder divino debe moverse dentro del dharma, pues sólo Pati (Śiva) es el supremo regidor de todos los actos.
Suta Goswami (narrating the episode to the sages of Naimisharanya)
It frames divine power as subordinate to dharma and ultimately to Pati (Shiva), reinforcing that Linga-worship aligns the pashu (soul) away from wrathful impulse (pāśa) toward disciplined reverence.
By implication, it contrasts transient divine anger with the higher governance of Pati—Shiva-tattva as the supreme regulator beyond reactive passions, before whom even great devas must be restrained.
A key Pāśupata-Yogic takeaway is krodha-nigraha (restraint of anger): the aspirant must dissolve pāśa (bondage) like rage and ego through discipline, devotion, and alignment with Pati.