Srimad Bhagavatam — Panchama Skandha, Shloka 15
Varṣa-devatā Worship in Jambūdvīpa: Hayagrīva/Hayaśīrṣa, Nṛsiṁha, Kāmadeva (Pradyumna), Matsya, Kūrma, and Varāha
केतुमालेऽपि भगवान् कामदेवस्वरूपेण लक्ष्म्या: प्रियचिकीर्षया प्रजापतेर्दुहितृणां पुत्राणां तद्वर्षपतीनां पुरुषायुषाहोरात्रपरिसङ्ख्यानानां यासां गर्भा महापुरुषमहास्त्रतेजसोद्वेजितमनसां विध्वस्ता व्यसव: संवत्सरान्ते विनिपतन्ति ॥ १५ ॥
ketumāle ’pi bhagavān kāmadeva-svarūpeṇa lakṣmyāḥ priya-cikīrṣayā prajāpater duhitṝṇāṁ putrāṇāṁ tad-varṣa-patīnāṁ puruṣāyuṣāho-rātra-parisaṅkhyānānāṁ yāsāṁ garbhā mahā-puruṣa-mahāstra-tejasodvejita-manasāṁ vidhvastā vyasavaḥ saṁvatsarānte vinipatanti.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continuó: En la región llamada Ketumāla-varṣa, el Señor Viṣṇu mora en la forma de Kāmadeva sólo para complacer a Sus devotos, en especial a Lakṣmījī. Allí se hallan el Prajāpati Saṁvatsara y sus hijos e hijas: las hijas son deidades rectoras de las noches y los hijos, de los días. Según el cómputo de días y noches de la vida humana, suman 36.000. Al final de cada año, las hijas, turbadas al ver el fulgor del gran arma del Mahāpuruṣa—el disco Sudarśana—sufren abortos espontáneos.
This Kāmadeva, who appears as Kṛṣṇa’s son named Pradyumna, is viṣṇu-tattva. How this is so is explained by Madhvācārya, who quotes from the Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa: kāmadeva-sthitaṁ viṣṇum upāste. Although this Kāmadeva is viṣṇu-tattva, His body is not spiritual but material. Lord Viṣṇu as Pradyumna or Kāmadeva accepts a material body, but He still acts spiritually. It does not make any difference whether He accepts a spiritual or a material body; He can act spiritually in any condition of existence. Māyāvādī philosophers regard even Lord Kṛṣṇa’s body as material, but their opinions cannot impede the spiritual activity of the Lord.
FAQs
This verse states that in Ketumāla-varṣa the Supreme Lord manifests as Kāmadeva, not as an ordinary god of lust, but as a divine form connected with pleasing Lakṣmīdevī and demonstrating His overpowering spiritual potency.
The verse explains that the Lord assumes this form with the intention of pleasing Lakṣmī (Śrī), indicating that even seemingly worldly motifs are ultimately situated in His divine, auspicious relationship with the goddess of fortune.
It highlights that when divine reality is approached through mere material desire, the mind becomes disturbed; the takeaway is to redirect attraction toward the Supreme with devotion rather than exploitation or lust.