एतेषां कारणानामनभिसंधाने विप्रलपन्तमचोरं विद्यात् ॥ कZ_०४.८.११ ॥
eteṣāṃ kāraṇānām anabhisaṃdhāne vipralapantam acoraṃ vidyāt
Si, en ausencia de estas causas (incriminatorias), una persona habla de forma incoherente o contradictoria, debe entenderse que no es ladrón (es decir, no es culpable de robo).
Guilt should not be inferred merely from confused speech when concrete causal grounds for suspicion are absent; the state must avoid treating anxiety or incoherence as proof.
It anticipates a ‘proof over demeanor’ approach: behavioral cues alone are insufficient without corroborating facts.