कलेवरोपभोग्यं हि गृहक्षेत्रादिकं च कः अदेहे ह्य् आत्मनि प्राज्ञो ममेदम् इति मन्यते
kalevaropabhogyaṃ hi gṛhakṣetrādikaṃ ca kaḥ adehe hy ātmani prājño mamedam iti manyate
House, field, and such possessions are only things to be enjoyed by the body; who, being truly wise, would think of the bodiless Self, “This is mine”?
Sage Parāśara (teaching Maitreya)
Speaker: Parasara
Topic: Why ownership (‘mamedam’) is irrational for the bodiless Self
Teaching: Ethical
Quality: compassionate
Concept: Since possessions like house and land are merely objects of bodily enjoyment, the wise do not attribute ‘mine’ to the bodiless Self.
Vedantic Theme: Dharma
Application: Hold property, status, and tools as stewardship rather than identity; reduce possessiveness through dana (giving) and simplicity.
Vishishtadvaita: Detachment is not negation of the world but reorientation: all ‘mine’ is truly the Lord’s, and the jīva enjoys/uses only as entrusted service (kainkarya).
Vishnu Form: Para-Brahman
Bhakti Type: Shanta
This verse frames property (house, land, etc.) as body-related enjoyment, urging the seeker to drop the sense of “mine” because the true Self is bodiless and cannot be an owner in a material sense.
He implies that possessions belong to the sphere of the body’s experience, whereas the ātman is “adeha” (bodiless); wisdom lies in not transferring bodily claims onto the Self.
By distinguishing the imperishable Self from perishable attachments, the teaching supports a Vishnu-centered liberation ethic: the soul turns from “mine-ness” toward the Supreme Reality who sustains cosmic order and grants release.