मायामोह-प्रवर्तन, वेदमार्ग-बहिष्कार, तथा पाषण्ड-संसर्ग-दोषः
Māyāmoha’s Delusion, Rejection of the Vedic Path, and the Fault of Heretical Association
प्रायश्चित्तेन महता शुद्धिं प्राप्नोत्य् अनापदि पक्षं नित्यक्रियाहानेः कर्ता मैत्रेय मानवः
prāyaścittena mahatā śuddhiṃ prāpnoty anāpadi pakṣaṃ nityakriyāhāneḥ kartā maitreya mānavaḥ
By a great act of expiation one may regain purity; yet in times free from distress, whoever allows even a fortnight’s lapse of the daily obligatory rites—O Maitreya—is to be regarded as blameworthy.
Sage Parāśara (addressing Maitreya)
Speaker: Parasara
Topic: Prāyaścitta for lapses in nitya-kriyā and culpability when no distress exists
Teaching: Ethical
Quality: precise
Concept: Purification is regained through substantial expiation, yet deliberate lapse of daily duties even for a fortnight (when not in distress) is a serious fault.
Vedantic Theme: Dharma
Application: When discipline breaks, repair promptly: acknowledge, make amends (extra japa/sevā/charity), and re-establish routine instead of normalizing neglect.
Vishishtadvaita: Śuddhi is relational—restoring one’s fitness for Bhagavad-ārādhana and community dharma, not merely private ‘self-improvement’.
This verse states that major expiation can restore purity, but it also emphasizes that expiation is not a license for neglect—daily duties must be maintained when no hardship prevents them.
He frames neglect as personal responsibility: if there is no crisis, even a fortnight’s lapse in obligatory daily rites is culpable because it represents abandonment of sustaining discipline.
Though Vishnu is not named in the verse, the teaching reflects Vaishnava dharma: orderly daily conduct and purification practices align the individual with the cosmic order ultimately upheld by Vishnu as Supreme Sovereignty.