Shloka 4.18.1

वाली–रामसंवादः (Rama’s Justification to Vali on Rājadharma)

Devanagari script

इत्युक्तः प्रश्रितं वाक्यं धर्मार्थसहितं हितम्।परुषं वालिना रामो निहतेन विचेतसा।।

Transliteration

ityuktaḥ praśritaṃ vākyaṃ dharmārtha-sahitaṃ hitam | paruṣaṃ vālinā rāmo nihatena vicetasā ||

Translation

Thus addressed, Rāma replied to Vālin’s harsh words—words outwardly courteous and well-intended, invoking dharma and expediency—spoken by one mortally wounded and confused in mind.

Context

To these harsh words though seemingly well-meaning, courteous and righteous, Vali who had been mortally wounded and confused in mind, Rama replied:

Characters & Entities

• Rāma
• Vālin
• dharma
• artha

FAQs

What is the core ethical principle (Dharma) in this verse?

It signals that dharma-discourse can be complex: speech may claim righteousness (dharma) and utility (artha) yet still be sharp and emotionally charged. The epic prepares for a reasoned ethical defense by Rāma.

What is the narrative situation?

A transition verse: after Vālin’s reproach, the narrator notes Rāma is about to answer.

Which character virtue is emphasized?

Measured response under accusation—Rāma is presented as replying within an ethical framework rather than mere anger.