HomeMatsya PuranaAdh. 140Shloka 48

Shloka 48

Matsya Purana — The Burning of Tripura and Rudra’s Victory

वैधुर्यं दैवतं दृष्ट्वा शैलादिर्गजवद्गतः किमिदं त्विति पप्रच्छ शूलपाणिं महेश्वरम् //

vaidhuryaṃ daivataṃ dṛṣṭvā śailādirgajavadgataḥ kimidaṃ tviti papraccha śūlapāṇiṃ maheśvaram //

Seeing the divine manifestation called Vaidhurya, Śailādi advanced like an elephant and asked Maheśvara, the trident-bearing Lord: “What is this?”

vaidhuryam(the entity/manifestation named) Vaidhurya
vaidhuryam:
daivatama deity, divine being/manifestation
daivatam:
dṛṣṭvāhaving seen
dṛṣṭvā:
śailādiḥŚailādi (proper name)
śailādiḥ:
gajavatlike an elephant
gajavat:
gataḥwent, proceeded
gataḥ:
kimwhat
kim:
idamthis
idam:
tuindeed/then
tu:
itithus
iti:
papracchaasked, inquired
papraccha:
śūlapāṇimthe trident-holder (Śiva)
śūlapāṇim:
maheśvaramMaheśvara, the Great Lord
maheśvaram:
Narrator (Purāṇic narrator) reporting Śailādi’s question to Lord Śiva
VaidhuryaŚailādiŚūlapāṇi (Śiva)Maheśvara (Śiva)
IconographyDevatā-darśanaŚivaSacred inquiryPurāṇic narrative

FAQs

This verse does not address pralaya directly; it depicts a devotional encounter—seeing a named divine manifestation (Vaidhurya) and seeking its meaning from Śiva.

It models dhārmic conduct through reverent inquiry: when confronted with a sacred sign or divine presence, one should approach a competent authority (here, Maheśvara) and ask respectfully to understand its nature and proper response.

The verse signals a ritual-interpretive setting: a specific divine manifestation is “seen” and identified by name, implying the kind of context where iconographic recognition and correct ritual understanding (often tied to installation/temple practice) become important, though no technical Vāstu rule is stated in this line.