HomeMatsya PuranaAdh. 144Shloka 16

Shloka 16

Matsya Purana — Characteristics of Dvāpara and Kali Yugas

आध्वर्यवं च प्रस्थानैर् बहुधा व्याकुलीकृतम् तथैवाथर्वणां साम्नां विकल्पैः स्वस्य संक्षयैः //

ādhvaryavaṃ ca prasthānair bahudhā vyākulīkṛtam tathaivātharvaṇāṃ sāmnāṃ vikalpaiḥ svasya saṃkṣayaiḥ //

The Adhvaryu tradition (of the Yajurveda) was thrown into confusion in many ways by divergent lineages and procedures; likewise, the Atharvan and the Sāman traditions were affected by alternative readings and by the decline or loss of their own corpus.

ādhvaryavamthe Adhvaryu/Yajurvedic tradition
ādhvaryavam:
caand
ca:
prasthānaiḥby (different) paths/lineages/ritual procedures
prasthānaiḥ:
bahudhāin many ways
bahudhā:
vyākulīkṛtammade confused/perturbed/disordered
vyākulīkṛtam:
tathā evajust so/likewise
tathā eva:
atharvaṇāmof the Atharvans (Atharvaveda tradition)
atharvaṇām:
sāmnāmof the Sāmans (Sāmaveda tradition)
sāmnām:
vikalpaiḥby alternatives/variant options/variant recensions
vikalpaiḥ:
svasyaof its own
svasya:
saṃkṣayaiḥby diminutions/declines/losses.
saṃkṣayaiḥ:
Lord Matsya (in discourse to Vaivasvata Manu)
Adhvaryu (Yajurveda tradition)AtharvavedaSamaveda
Vedic recensionsRitual procedureŚrautaTextual variantsDharma preservation

FAQs

It does not describe cosmic Pralaya directly; it highlights a cultural/ritual decline—Vedic traditions becoming fragmented through variant procedures and partial loss of textual material.

By implying that dharma depends on stable Vedic transmission, it supports the king’s duty to protect learned lineages and the householder’s duty to maintain correct ritual practice through competent teachers rather than confused, competing variants.

The significance is ritual: it points to divergences in Śrauta performance and Vedic śākhā traditions (Adhvaryu/Yajur, Atharvan, Sāman), warning that alternative readings and losses can disrupt proper sacrificial procedure.