Adhyaya 37 — Alarka’s Crisis and the Teaching on Non-Attachment (Madālasa’s Instruction Recalled)
न्यूूनातिरिक्ततां याति पञ्चकेऽस्मिन् सुखासुखम् ।
यदि स्यान्म किन्न स्यादन्यस्थेऽपि हि तन्मयि ॥
nyūnātiriktatāṃ yāti pañcake ’smin sukhāsukham | yadi syān ma kin na syād anyasthe ’pi hi tan-mayi ||
Pleasure and pain are found as deficiency or excess within this fivefold aggregate, the embodied complex. If they truly belonged to me, why would they not exist for me even when I abide elsewhere, apart from it, though my nature is consciousness?
{ "primaryRasa": "shanta", "secondaryRasa": "jnana", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Pleasure and pain fluctuate due to conditions in the embodied complex; therefore one should not claim them as the Self. Ethically, this supports equanimity and reduced attachment/aversion.
Not a pañcalakṣaṇa topic (sarga/pratisarga/vaṃśa/manvantara/vaṃśānucarita); it belongs to upadeśa (instruction) embedded in narrative dialogue.
‘Deficiency/excess’ hints that sukha-duḥkha are measurable modifications (vikāra) of the kośa-complex; the witnessing Self is non-quantifiable and thus not their locus.