Shloka 32
अध्याय ३३ — कर्म, दैव, हठ, स्वभाव और पुरुषार्थ पर द्रौपदी का उपदेश
Draupadī on Action, Fate, and Human Effort
न हि कामेन कामोअनन््य: साध्यते फलमेव तत् । उपयोगात् फलस्यैव काष्ठाद् भस्मेव पण्डितै:,“जैसे फल उपभोगमें आकर कृतार्थ हो जाता है, उससे दूसरा फल नहीं प्राप्त हो सकता तथा जिस प्रकार काष्ठसे भस्म बन सकता है, परंतु उस भस्मसे दूसरा कोई पदार्थ नहीं बन सकता; इसी तरह बुद्धिमान् पुरुष एक कामसे किसी दूसरे कामकी सिद्धि नहीं मानते, क्योंकि वह साधन नहीं, फल ही है
na hi kāmena kāmo 'nanyaḥ sādhyate phalam eva tat | upayogāt phalasyaiva kāṣṭhād bhasmeva paṇḍitaiḥ ||
Vaiśampāyana said: Desire cannot be used to accomplish some other, separate desire; it is itself only a result to be consumed. The wise explain that once a fruit has been enjoyed, no further fruit is obtained from it; and just as wood can be reduced to ash, yet from that ash no new substance is produced—so too they do not regard one desire as a means to fulfill another, for desire is an end-product, not a true instrument of attainment.
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
Desire (kāma) is treated as a consumable outcome rather than a reliable means: indulging one desire does not generate a higher or different fulfillment, just as a fruit yields nothing further after being eaten and ash cannot be turned into a new productive substance.
In Vaiśampāyana’s narration, a reflective, instructive point is made using everyday analogies (fruit and ash) to frame an ethical lesson: wise people do not build life’s aims on the logic that one indulgence will serve as a tool to secure another, because indulgence is an end-state, not a sustaining instrument.