Shloka 28
Draupadī’s Lament and Theodicy: Dharma, Dice, and Īśvara’s Governance (Āraṇyaka-parva 31)
नाचरिष्यन् परे धर्म परे परतरे च ये । विप्रलम्भो5यमत्यन्तं यदि स्युरफला: क्रिया:,यदि तप, ब्रह्मचर्य, यज्ञ, स्वाध्याय, दान और सरलता आदि धर्म निष्फल होते तो पहले जो श्रेष्ठ और श्रेष्ठतर पुरुष हुए हैं वे धर्मका आचरण नहीं करते। यदि धार्मिक क्रियाओंका कुछ फल नहीं होता, वे सब निरी ठगविद्या होतीं तो ऋषि, देवता, गन्धर्व, असुर तथा राक्षस प्रभावशाली होते हुए भी किसलिये आदरपूर्वक धर्मका आचरण करते
yudhiṣṭhira uvāca | nācariṣyan pare dharme pare paratare ca ye | vipralambho 'yam atyantaṁ yadi syur aphalāḥ kriyāḥ ||
Yudhiṣṭhira said: “If the highest, higher, and highest-of-all forms of dharma truly had no efficacy, then the great men of earlier times would not have practiced them. If religious disciplines were utterly fruitless—mere deception—then why would the powerful ṛṣis, gods, gandharvas, asuras, and rākṣasas still observe dharma with reverence? The very fact that even the mighty uphold it shows that dharma is not empty, and that moral action is not without consequence.”
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
Yudhiṣṭhira argues that dharma must have real value and consequence: if righteous disciplines were truly fruitless, the wisest and most powerful beings across worlds would not continue to honor and practice them. The widespread, reverent adherence to dharma is presented as evidence of its efficacy.
In the Vana Parva discussion on conduct and suffering, Yudhiṣṭhira voices a reasoned defense of dharma against the doubt that religious and ethical actions might be pointless. He appeals to the example of ancient great men and even non-human powerful classes of beings who still uphold dharma.