Shloka 52
अम्बा–राम–भीष्म संवादः
Amba–Rama–Bhishma Dialogue on Vow and Refuge
ब्रह्महत्या न तस्य स्यादिति धर्मेषु निश्चय: । क्षत्रियाणां स्थितो धर्मे क्षत्रियोडस्मि तपोधन
brahmahatyā na tasya syād iti dharmeṣu niścayaḥ | kṣatriyāṇāṃ sthito dharme kṣatriyo ’smi tapodhana |
Rāma said: “The dharma-texts are decisive on this point: if a Brahmin takes up the kṣatriya’s mode of battle—bearing bow and arrows, advancing in wrath to fight without turning his back in flight—then the warrior who kills him, seeing him in that condition, does not incur the sin of Brahmin-slaying. O ascetic rich in austerity, I am a kṣatriya, established in the dharma of kṣatriyas.”
राम उवाच
Educational Q&A
Moral culpability is assessed by role and conduct in a given situation: when a Brahmin adopts the kṣatriya’s battlefield posture and engages as a combatant, the act of killing him in that combat is treated under the rules of war rather than as brahmahatyā; the speaker grounds this in dharma-textual precedent and affirms his own kṣatriya duty.
Rāma addresses an ascetic (tapodhana) and justifies a wartime ethical rule: he states that dharma authorities hold that killing a Brahmin who has entered battle like a kṣatriya does not bring the specific sin of Brahmin-slaying, and he frames his stance as consistent with his identity and obligations as a kṣatriya.