Shloka 51
अम्बा–राम–भीष्म संवादः
Amba–Rama–Bhishma Dialogue on Vow and Refuge
उद्यतेषुमथो दृष्ट्वा ब्राह्म॒णं क्षत्रबन्धुवत् । यो हन्यात् समरे क्रुद्धं युध्यन्तमपलायिनम्
udyateṣu matho dṛṣṭvā brāhmaṇaṁ kṣatrabandhuvat | yo hanyāt samare kruddhaṁ yudhyantam apalāyinam ||
Seeing even a brāhmaṇa take up weapons like a kṣatriya—angry in battle, fighting face to face and not fleeing—whoever strikes and kills him in combat does not incur the sin of brahmahatyā. This is the settled judgment of the dharmaśāstras. O ascetic rich in austerity, I am a kṣatriya, established in the very code of kṣatriyas.
राम उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse frames an ethical-legal principle: if a brāhmaṇa abandons the protected noncombatant role and fights as an armed combatant without retreat, then killing him in fair battle is treated as a wartime act under kṣatriya-dharma, not as brahmahatyā. It emphasizes role-based dharma and contextual judgment in warfare.
Rāma is justifying a kṣatriya’s conduct in battle by citing dharmaśāstra: when a brāhmaṇa takes up arms and fights like a warrior, he is to be regarded as a combatant; therefore a warrior who kills him in that state is not blamed with the gravest sin. Rāma then asserts his own identity and obligation as a kṣatriya.