इन्द्र रवाच ऋषत्विज: कुण्जरास्तत्र वाजिनो<थ्वर्यवस्तथा । हवींषि परमांसानि रुधिरं त्वाज्यमुच्यते,इन्द्रने कहा--राजन्! इस युद्धयज्ञमें हाथी ही ऋत्विज् हैं, घोड़े अध्वर्यु हैं, शत्रुओंका मांस ही हविष्य है और उनके रक्तको ही घृत कहा जाता है
indra uvāca—rājan, asmin yuddha-yajñe kuñjarā eva ṛtvijaḥ, vājino ’dhvaryavaḥ tathā; havīṃṣi paramāṃsāni, rudhiraṃ tv ājyam ucyate.
Indra said: “O King, in this sacrifice that is war, the elephants themselves are the officiating priests, and the horses serve as the adhvaryu-priests. The oblation is the very flesh of the foes, and their blood is what is called the ghee.”
अम्बरीष उवाच
The verse illustrates how war can be described using the language of Vedic sacrifice, turning instruments of battle into ritual roles and blood into ‘ghee.’ This highlights a key Mahabharata concern: dharma can be argued through powerful metaphors, yet such sacralization of violence raises ethical tension and demands discernment.
Indra addresses a king and characterizes the ongoing conflict as a ‘war-sacrifice,’ mapping elephants and horses onto priestly functions and defining enemy flesh and blood as offerings. The speech functions as a rhetorical reframing meant to interpret (and potentially justify) the brutality of battle within a ritual paradigm.