Shloka 24

पितृभक्तो दृढतपा: पितु: सुदयित: सुतः । अनन्यमनसा तेन कथं पित्रा विसर्जित:,“यह बड़ा ही तपस्वी और पितृभक्त था और अपने पिताका बहुत ही प्यारा बेटा था। उनका मन सदा इसीमें लगा रहता था; फिर भी उन्होंने इसे जानेकी आज्ञा कैसे दे दी?”

pitṛbhakto dṛḍhatapāḥ pituḥ sudayitaḥ sutaḥ | ananyamanasā tena kathaṁ pitrā visarjitaḥ ||

Śuka said: “He was steadfast in austerity and devoted to his father, and he was a son exceedingly dear to him. His mind was fixed on him alone; even so, how could the father have given him leave to depart?”

पितृभक्तःdevoted to (his) father
पितृभक्तः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootपितृभक्त
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
दृढतपाःof firm/steadfast austerity
दृढतपाः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootदृढतपस्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
पितुःof (his) father
पितुः:
TypeNoun
Rootपितृ
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
सुदयितःvery dear
सुदयितः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootसुदयित
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सुतःson
सुतः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootसुत
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अनन्यमनसाwith an undistracted mind; single-mindedly
अनन्यमनसा:
Karana
TypeAdjective
Rootअनन्यमनस्
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Singular
तेनby him / with him
तेन:
Karana
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine/Neuter, Instrumental, Singular
कथम्how?
कथम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकथम्
पित्राby the father
पित्रा:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootपितृ
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Singular
विसर्जितःdismissed / sent away / permitted to depart
विसर्जितः:
TypeVerb
Rootवि + सृज्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular, क्त (past passive participle)

शुक उवाच

शुक (Śuka)
पिता (the father)
सुत (the son)

Educational Q&A

The verse highlights a moral tension central to dharma: even when love and attachment are strong (a beloved, dutiful son), a higher duty or spiritual necessity may require letting go. It invites reflection on when permission, release, or renunciation is ethically appropriate despite personal affection.

Śuka questions an apparent contradiction in the story: the son is described as intensely devoted, austere, and dearly loved, with an undivided mind—yet the father still allows him to leave. The line functions as a prompt for the next explanation of the circumstances and principles that justified the father’s decision.