Śuka’s Guṇa-Transcendence and Vyāsa’s Consolation (शुकगति-वर्णनम्)
परिगणित गुणों और दोषोंमेंसे अमुक गुण या दोष पहले कहना चाहिये और अमुकको पीछे कहना अभीष्ट है। इस प्रकार जो पूर्वापरके क्रमका विचार होता है, उसका नाम क्रम है और जिस वाकयमें ऐसा क्रम हो, उस वाक्यको वाक्यतवेत्ता विद्वान् क्रमयुक्त कहते हैं ।।
bhīṣma uvāca | dharmakāmārthamokṣeṣu pratijñāya viśeṣataḥ | idaṃ tad iti vākyānte procyate sa vinirṇayaḥ ||
Bhishma said: Among the merits and faults that have been enumerated, the consideration of which should be stated first and which afterwards—the reflection on prior and subsequent order—is called krama (sequence); and a sentence that bears such sequence is called by those skilled in discourse krama-yukta (endowed with order). Further, in matters of dharma, wealth (artha), pleasure (kāma), and liberation (mokṣa), when a teacher first makes a specific pledge to establish one of these as the principal point, and then at the end concludes, “This indeed is the intended subject,” the settled determination thus fixed is called vinirṇaya (final decision).
भीष्य उवाच
A discourse becomes a firm doctrinal conclusion (vinirṇaya) when the speaker first announces a specific thesis about one of the four aims of life—dharma, artha, kāma, or mokṣa—and then explicitly seals it at the end by identifying it as the intended point (“this is that”).
In the Shanti Parva’s instructional setting, Bhishma is teaching Yudhishthira principles of correct exposition and doctrinal clarity—how a teacher frames a topic, maintains focus, and concludes with a decisive statement that fixes the intended meaning.