नारद–शुक संवादः
Impermanence, Svabhāva, and Śuka’s Resolve for Yoga
अन्यश्ष शाश्वृतोडव्यक्तस्तथान्य: पठचविंशक: । तस्य द्वावनुपश्येतां तमेकमिति साधव:
anyaś ca śāśvato ’vyaktas tathānyaḥ pañcaviṁśakaḥ | tasya dvāv anupaśyetāṁ tam ekam iti sādhavaḥ ||
Yājñavalkya said: “One is the eternal Unmanifest; another is the ‘twenty-fifth’ principle. The wise perceive these two as pointing to that single Reality—declaring, ‘That One alone is.’”
याज़्ञवल्क्य उवाच
The verse teaches that what are described as two principles—(1) the eternal Unmanifest (avyakta) and (2) the ‘twenty-fifth’ principle (pañcaviṁśaka, often Puruṣa)—are ultimately understood by the wise as indicating one single Reality. The ethical-spiritual implication is to move beyond conceptual divisions and seek the unifying truth through discernment.
In Śānti Parva’s philosophical instruction, Yājñavalkya is explaining a doctrinal point using Sāṅkhya-style terminology. He notes that different descriptions or enumerations may speak of an Unmanifest and a twenty-fifth principle, yet accomplished seekers interpret these as converging on one ultimate principle rather than two competing absolutes.