जनक-राज्ञः मौण्ड्य-परिव्रज्या-विवादः
Janaka’s Renunciation Questioned; Discourse on Dāna and Detachment
अनिष्कषाये काषायमीहार्थमिति विद्धि तम् धर्मध्वजानां मुण्डानां वृत्यर्थमिति मे मिति:,“यदि हृदयका कषाय (राग आदि दोष) दूर न हुआ हो तो काषाय (गेरुआ) वस्त्र धारण करना स्वार्थ-साधनकी चेष्टाके लिये ही समझना चाहिये। मेरा तो ऐसा विश्वास है कि धर्मका ढोंग रखनेवाले मथमुंडोंके लिये यह जीविका चलानेका एक धंधामात्र है
aniṣkāṣāye kāṣāyam īhārtham iti viddhi tam | dharmadhvajānāṁ muṇḍānāṁ vṛttyartham iti me matiḥ ||
Know that wearing ochre robes while one’s inner stains have not been cleansed is merely an attempt at self-serving gain. In my judgment, for shaven-headed men who parade the banner of religion, it becomes only a means of livelihood—religious display without inner purification.
अजुन उवाच
Outer marks of renunciation (like ochre robes and a shaven head) are ethically meaningless if inner impurities—attachment, passion, and other दोष—remain. True dharma requires inner cleansing; otherwise religious symbols become tools for self-interest and livelihood.
Arjuna voices a critical judgment about pseudo-ascetics: if a person has not removed inner defilements, adopting ascetic dress is not genuine renunciation but a strategy for personal gain, turning धर्म into a public display and a means of subsistence.