जनक-राज्ञः मौण्ड्य-परिव्रज्या-विवादः
Janaka’s Renunciation Questioned; Discourse on Dāna and Detachment
“सदा ही याचना करनेवालेको और दम्भीको दी हुई दक्षिणा दावानलमें दी गयी आहुतिके समान व्यर्थ है ।। जातवेदा यथा राजन् नादग्ध्वैवोपशाम्यति । सदैव याचमानो हि तथा शाम्यति न द्विज:,“राजन! जैसे आग लकड़ीको जलाये बिना नहीं बुझती, उसी प्रकार सदा ही याचना करनेवाला ब्राह्मण (याचनाका अन्त किये बिना) कभी शान्त नहीं हो सकता
jātavedā yathā rājan nādagdhvaivopaśāmyati | sadaiva yācamāno hi tathā śāmyati na dvijaḥ ||
O King, just as fire does not subside without first consuming fuel, so too a brahmin who is forever begging does not attain inner quiet so long as that habit of constant solicitation continues. A gift (dakṣiṇā) given to one who is persistently importunate and hypocritical is likened to an oblation cast into a wildfire—wasted and without wholesome fruit.
अजुन उवाच
The verse warns that habitual, insatiable begging prevents inner peace, and that gifts given to the perpetually importunate and hypocritical are ethically unfruitful—like offerings thrown into a wildfire.
A speaker addresses a king and uses the image of fire needing fuel to illustrate a moral point about recipients of charity: a person who constantly solicits does not become content, so indiscriminate giving to such a person is portrayed as wasted.