Shloka 37

स ददर्श श्वमांसस्य कुतन्त्रीं विततां मुनि: । चाण्डालस्य गृहे राजन्‌ सद्यः शस्त्रहतस्य वै,राजन! इतने हीमें उन्होंने देखा कि चाण्डालके घरमें तुरंतके शस्त्रद्वारा मारे हुए कुत्तेकी जाँघके मांसका एक बड़ा-सा टुकड़ा पड़ा है

sa dadarśa śvamāṃsasya kutantrīṃ vitatāṃ muniḥ | cāṇḍālasya gṛhe rājan sadyaḥ śastrahatasya vai ||

Bhishma said: O King, the sage then saw, in a Caṇḍāla’s house, a strip of dog’s flesh laid out—taken from a dog that had just been killed by a weapon.

सःhe
सः:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
ददर्शsaw
ददर्श:
TypeVerb
Rootदृश्
FormPerfect (Liṭ), Third, Singular, Parasmaipada
श्वमांसस्यof dog-meat
श्वमांसस्य:
TypeNoun
Rootश्वमांस
FormNeuter, Genitive, Singular
कुतन्त्रीम्a strip/cord-like piece (of flesh)
कुतन्त्रीम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootकुतन्त्री
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
वितताम्spread out, stretched
वितताम्:
TypeAdjective
Rootवि-तन्
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular, Past passive participle (kta)
मुनिःthe sage
मुनिः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootमुनि
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
चाण्डालस्यof a caṇḍāla
चाण्डालस्य:
TypeNoun
Rootचाण्डाल
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
गृहेin (the) house
गृहे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootगृह
FormNeuter, Locative, Singular
राजन्O king
राजन्:
TypeNoun
Rootराजन्
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
सद्यःimmediately, just then
सद्यः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootसद्यः
शस्त्रहतस्यof one slain by a weapon
शस्त्रहतस्य:
TypeAdjective
Rootशस्त्रहत
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular, Past passive participle (kta)
वैindeed, surely
वै:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootवै

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhīṣma
T
the King (rājan, i.e., Yudhiṣṭhira as listener)
M
muni (a sage)
C
Caṇḍāla
D
dog (śvan)
D
dog-flesh (śvamāṃsa)
W
weapon (śastra)
H
house (gṛha)

Educational Q&A

The verse sets up a classic dharma problem: when one faces extreme necessity, the usual rules of purity and social avoidance are tested. It invites reflection on how to weigh competing duties—survival, compassion, and adherence to norms—when circumstances are harsh.

Bhīṣma narrates that a sage comes upon a Caṇḍāla’s house and sees a freshly weapon-killed dog’s flesh laid out. This discovery functions as a narrative trigger for the ensuing ethical discussion about conduct under distress.