Shloka 20

प्रह्मादेन द्वतं राज्यं महेन्द्रस्य महात्मन: । शीलमाश्रित्य दैत्येन त्रैलोक्यं च वशे कृतम्‌,दैत्यराज प्रह्मादने शीलका ही आश्रय लेकर महामना महेन्द्रका राज्य हर लिया और तीनों लोकोंको भी अपने वशमें कर लिया

prahlādena hṛtaṃ rājyaṃ mahendrasya mahātmanaḥ | śīlam āśritya daityena trailokyaṃ ca vaśe kṛtam ||

Ghaṭayāṭra said: ‘By relying upon his good conduct and disciplined character, the Daitya Prahlāda seized the sovereignty of the great-souled Mahendra (Indra) and brought the three worlds under his control.’

प्रह्लादेनby Prahlada
प्रह्लादेन:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootप्रह्लाद
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Singular
दत्तम्given (bestowed)
दत्तम्:
Karma
TypeVerb
Rootदा (ददाति)
Formक्त (past passive participle), Neuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
राज्यम्kingdom, sovereignty
राज्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootराज्य
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
महेन्द्रस्यof Mahendra (Indra)
महेन्द्रस्य:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootमहेन्द्र
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
महात्मनःof the great-souled (one)
महात्मनः:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootमहात्मन्
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
शीलम्conduct, character, virtue
शीलम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootशील
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
आश्रित्यhaving resorted to, relying on
आश्रित्य:
Karana
TypeVerb
Rootआ-श्रि (श्रयति)
Formक्त्वा-प्रत्यय (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage)
दैत्येनby the Daitya (demon)
दैत्येन:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootदैत्य
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Singular
त्रैलोक्यम्the three worlds
त्रैलोक्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootत्रैलोक्य
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
वशेunder control, in subjection
वशे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootवश
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
कृतम्made, brought about
कृतम्:
Karma
TypeVerb
Rootकृ (करोति)
Formक्त (past passive participle), Neuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular

घतयाट्र उवाच

G
Ghaṭayāṭra
P
Prahlāda
M
Mahendra (Indra)
D
Daitya
T
Trailokya (three worlds)

Educational Q&A

The verse underscores the potency of śīla (character and disciplined conduct) as a source of authority and influence. It also invites reflection on ethical ambiguity: virtue can empower, but the ends to which it is applied—such as conquest—must be judged within dharma.

The speaker states that Prahlāda, a Daitya, relied on his exemplary conduct to overpower Mahendra (Indra), taking his kingdom and subjugating the three worlds—depicting a reversal of cosmic political order achieved through personal merit.