महाप्राज्ञ: सौमकिर्यज्ञसेन: कन्यां पाज्चालीं पाण्डवेभ्य: प्रदाय | अकार्षीद् वै सुकृतं नेह किंचित् क्लीबा: पार्था: पतयो याज्ञसेन्या:,“महाबुद्धिमान् सोमकवंशी राजा ट्रुपदने अपनी कन्या पांचालीको पाण्डवोंके लिये देकर कोई अच्छा काम नहीं किया। द्रौपदीके पति ये कुन्तीपुत्र निरे नपुंसक ही हैं
mahāprājñaḥ saumikir yajñasenaḥ kanyāṃ pāñcālīṃ pāṇḍavebhyaḥ pradāya | akārsīd vai sukṛtaṃ neha kiṃcit klībāḥ pārthāḥ patayo yājñasenyāḥ ||
Vaiśampāyana said: “Though highly intelligent, Yajñasena (Drupada) did no truly meritorious deed in giving his daughter Pāñcālī to the Pāṇḍavas; for the sons of Pṛthā (the Pārthas), the husbands of Yajñasenī, are spoken of here as ‘impotent’—a harsh censure implying their present incapacity and humiliation rather than a settled judgment on their worth.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse highlights how public honor and perceived capability shape ethical judgments in royal politics: a marriage alliance is praised as ‘meritorious’ only when it upholds dignity and strength; when the recipients are viewed as powerless or disgraced, the same act is condemned, showing the tension between dharma, reputation, and political prudence.
In the context of the Sabha Parva’s courtly conflict and humiliation, the narrator reports a severe disparagement: Drupada’s act of giving Draupadī to the Pāṇḍavas is criticized as not being a ‘good deed,’ because the Pāṇḍavas—Draupadī’s husbands—are derided as ‘klība’ (powerless/impotent), reflecting their current dishonor and vulnerability.