Shloka 51
Rājasūyābhiṣeka-darśana: Duryodhana’s Observation of the Consecration
अपृष्टवा विदुरं स्वस्य नासीत् कश्रिद् विनिश्चय: । द्यूते दोषांश्न जानन् स पुत्रस्नेहादकृष्यत,विदुरसे पूछे बिना उनका कोई भी निश्चय नहीं होता था। जूएके दोषोंको जानते हुए भी वे पुत्रस्नेहहे उसकी ओर आकृष्ट हो गये थे
apṛṣṭvā viduraṃ svasya nāsīt kaścid viniścayaḥ | dyūte doṣāṃś ca jānan sa putrasnehād akṛṣyata ||
Vaiśampāyana said: Without first consulting Vidura, he could arrive at no firm decision. Yet, though he understood the faults inherent in gambling, he was drawn toward it by affection for his son.
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
Even when one knows an action is harmful (such as gambling), attachment—especially parental affection—can overpower discernment. The verse also highlights the ethical necessity of seeking wise counsel (Vidura) before making consequential decisions.
The narrator describes Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s dependence on Vidura for sound judgment, yet shows how Dhṛtarāṣṭra, despite recognizing the dangers of the dice-game, becomes inclined toward it due to affection for his son (Duryodhana), setting the stage for the unfolding crisis.