Sabhā-praveśa, Dāna, and the Courtly Convergence (सभा-प्रवेशः दानं च)
आहुको विपृथुश्चैव गद: सारण एव च । अक्रूरः कृतवर्मा च सत्यकश्न शिने: सुत:
āhuko vipṛthuś caiva gadaḥ sāraṇa eva ca | akrūraḥ kṛtavarmā ca satyakaś ca śineḥ sutaḥ ||
Vaiśampāyana said: “Āhuka, Vipṛthu, and also Gada; likewise Sāraṇa; and Akrūra; and Kṛtavarmā; and Satyaka, the son of Śini.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse itself is primarily a roster, but its ethical import lies in how the epic frames dharma through networks of kinship and alliance: named elders, counsellors, and warriors represent the social and political forces whose choices—support, counsel, or neutrality—shape righteous or unrighteous outcomes in royal affairs.
Vaiśampāyana is listing notable Yādava/Vṛṣṇi figures—Āhuka, Vipṛthu, Gada, Sāraṇa, Akrūra, Kṛtavarmā, and Satyaka (identified as Śini’s son)—as part of a broader description of persons present/recognized in the Sabha context, establishing who the key participants and potential allies are.