Shloka 22
कर्णवधोत्तरं शल्य-दुर्योधनसंवादः
Aftermath of Karṇa’s Fall: Śalya’s Address to Duryodhana
(भीमस्य पुत्र: समराग्रयायी महास्त्रविच्चापि तवानुरूप: । यत्नं समासाद्य रिपोर्बलं नो निमीलिताक्षं भयविप्लुतं भवेत् ।।
sañjaya uvāca |
(bhīmasya putraḥ samarāgrayāyī mahāstravic cāpi tavānurūpaḥ |
yatnaṃ samāsādya ripor balaṃ no nimīlitākṣaṃ bhayaviplutaṃ bhavet ||
cakāra yo 'sau niśi yuddham ekaḥ tyaktvā raṇaṃ yasya bhayād dravanti |
sa cet samāsādya mahānubhāvaḥ karṇa raṇe bāṇagaṇaiḥ pramohā[ ] |
dhairye sthitenāpi ca sūtajena śaktyā hato vāsavadattayā tayā ||)
Sañjaya said: “Bhīma’s son—foremost in the van of battle, a master of great weapons, and in prowess a match for you—was such that even with all their effort our enemies’ host would have been thrown into panic, shutting their eyes in fear. He was the hero who fought alone by night, so that soldiers, terrified, abandoned the field and fled. Advancing against Karṇa in the thick of battle, he bewildered the ranks with showers of arrows; yet Karṇa, the charioteer’s son, steady in courage, slew him with that Śakti weapon granted by Indra. Thus the narrative underscores a grim ethical tension of war: extraordinary valor and skill can still be overturned by fate, divine boons, and the unequal distribution of power—leaving survivors to read defeat as the ripening of past deeds.”
संजय उवाच
Educational Q&A
The passage highlights how, in war, even exceptional valor and mastery can be overturned by forces beyond ordinary merit—divine boons, strategic asymmetry, and the ripening of prior deeds—raising ethical reflection on power, fairness, and the human cost of victory.
Sañjaya describes Bhīma’s son (Ghaṭotkaca) as a terrifying vanguard who fought fiercely—especially at night—causing enemy troops to flee. He attacks Karṇa and confounds the battlefield with arrow-showers, but Karṇa remains steady and kills him using the Śakti weapon bestowed by Indra.