Shloka 18
एतत् तत्त्वेन मे तात सर्वमाख्यातुमर्हसि । मतड़स्य यथातत्त्वं तथैवैतद् वदस्व मे,तात! यह सब आप यथार्थरूपसे बतानेकी कृपा करें। जैसे मतड़को तपस्या करनेसे भी ब्राह्मणत्व नहीं प्राप्त हुआ, वैसी ही बात विश्वामित्रके लिये क्यों नहीं हुई? यह मुझे बताइये
etad tattvena me tāta sarvam ākhyātum arhasi | mataṅgasya yathātattvaṁ tathaivaitad vadasva me, tāta |
Yudhiṣṭhira said: “Dear father-figure, you ought to explain all this to me in accordance with the truth. Tell me precisely: just as Mataṅga did not attain Brahminhood even through austerities, why did the same not apply in the case of Viśvāmitra? Please explain this to me.”
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse frames an ethical-philosophical problem: whether spiritual effort (tapas) can transform one’s social-spiritual status (Brahminhood), and if so, why outcomes differ between exemplars. It invites a nuanced explanation of dharma, merit, and the conditions under which inner realization and recognized status align.
Yudhiṣṭhira respectfully asks his elder/teacher to clarify an apparent inconsistency: Mataṅga’s austerities did not yield Brahminhood, yet Viśvāmitra is famed for attaining Brahmin/ṛṣi status through tapas. He requests a truthful, detailed account resolving this contrast.