Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 7

Sundopasundayoḥ Tapas–Varadāna–Prasaṅgaḥ

Sunda and Upasunda: Austerities and the Boon

न चापि कृष्णा शक्‍्येत तेभ्यो भेदयितुं पर: । परिद्यूनान्‌ वृतवती किमुताद्य मृजावत:,कृष्णाको भी उनकी ओरसे फूट डालकर विलग करना असम्भव है; क्योंकि जब पाण्डवलोग भिक्षाभोजी होनेके कारण दीन-हीन थे, उस अवस्थामें कृष्णाने उनका वरण किया है; अब तो वे सम्पत्तिशाली होकर स्वच्छ एवं सुन्दर वेषमें रहते हैं, अब वह क्‍यों उनकी ओरसे विरक्त होगी?

na cāpi kṛṣṇā śakyeta tebhyo bhedayituṃ paraḥ | paridyūnān vṛtavatī kim utādya mṛjāvataḥ ||

Karna said: “Nor is it possible for anyone else to estrange Kṛṣṇā from them by sowing dissension. For she chose the Pāṇḍavas even when they were utterly reduced—living on alms and brought low; how much more, then, now that they are prosperous, clean, and well-adorned, would she ever turn away from them?”

not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अपिeven/also
अपि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअपि
कृष्णाKṛṣṇā (Draupadī)
कृष्णा:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootकृष्णा
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
शक्येतcould be able (to)
शक्येत:
TypeVerb
Rootशक्
FormOptative, Parasmaipada, 3rd, Singular
तेभ्यःfrom them
तेभ्यः:
Apadana
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine, Ablative, Plural
भेदयितुम्to separate/sow dissension
भेदयितुम्:
TypeVerb
Rootभिद्
FormTumun (infinitive)
परःanother person/outsider
परः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootपर
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
परिद्यूनान्utterly wretched/very poor
परिद्यूनान्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootपरिद्यून
FormMasculine, Accusative, Plural
वृतवतीhaving chosen (as husband)/having accepted
वृतवती:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootवृत
FormKta (past active participle used as finite sense), Feminine, Nominative, Singular
किम्what? (how much more/why)
किम्:
TypePronoun
Rootकिम्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
उतindeed/then (emphatic)
उत:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootउत
अद्यtoday/now
अद्य:
Adhikarana
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअद्य
मृजावतःof the clean/neat (well-groomed) ones
मृजावतः:
TypeAdjective
Rootमृजावत्
FormMasculine, Genitive, Plural

कर्ण उवाच

K
Karna
K
Kṛṣṇā (Draupadī)
P
Pāṇḍavas

Educational Q&A

True loyalty is tested in hardship: Draupadī’s commitment was proven when the Pāṇḍavas were destitute, so it is ethically and psychologically implausible that she would abandon them in prosperity.

Karna argues that attempts to break the bond between Draupadī and the Pāṇḍavas will fail; she accepted them even in their lowest condition, therefore she will remain firmly aligned with them now that they are flourishing.