HomeChanakya NitiCh. 6Shloka 12
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 12

Self-Discipline — Chanakya Niti

लुब्धमर्थेन गृह्णीयात् स्तब्धमञ्जलिकर्मणा ।

मूर्खं छन्दोऽनुवृत्त्या च यथार्थत्वेन पण्डितम् ॥

lubdham arthena gṛhṇīyāt stabdham añjalikarmaṇā |

mūrkhaṃ chando'nuvṛttyā ca yathārthatvena paṇḍitam ||

Win the greedy with gain; soften the arrogant with deference. Lead the fool by agreeable compliance; address the learned with truthful, accurate speech.

लुब्धम्a greedy (person)
लुब्धम्:
TypeAdjective
Rootलुब्ध
Formपुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन
अर्थेनby wealth / with money
अर्थेन:
TypeNoun
Rootअर्थ
Formपुंलिङ्ग, तृतीया, एकवचन
गृह्णीयात्one should win over / take hold of
गृह्णीयात्:
TypeVerb
Rootग्रह्
Formविधिलिङ्, प्रथमपुरुष, एकवचन (परस्मैपद)
स्तब्धम्a proud/rigid (person)
स्तब्धम्:
TypeAdjective
Rootस्तब्ध
Formपुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन
अञ्जलिकर्मणाby the act of salutation (folded hands)
अञ्जलिकर्मणा:
TypeNoun
Rootअञ्जलिकर्मन्
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, तृतीया, एकवचन
मूर्खम्a fool
मूर्खम्:
TypeNoun
Rootमूर्ख
Formपुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन
छन्दःhis wish/liking
छन्दः:
TypeNoun
Rootछन्दस्
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन
अनुवृत्त्याby compliance / by following along
अनुवृत्त्या:
TypeNoun
Rootअनुवृत्ति
Formस्त्रीलिङ्ग, तृतीया, एकवचन
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
Formअव्यय
यथार्थत्वेनby truthfulness / by stating facts
यथार्थत्वेन:
TypeNoun
Rootयथार्थत्व
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, तृतीया, एकवचन
पण्डितम्a learned man
पण्डितम्:
TypeNoun
Rootपण्डित
Formपुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन
Chanakya (Kautilya)
अनुष्टुप्
Ancient EthicsPolitical HistorySanskrit LiteratureHistory of Political Thought
Greedy person (lubdha)Arrogant/unbending person (stabdha)Foolish person (mūrkha)Learned person (paṇḍita)

FAQs

In the Chanakya-nīti/Nītiśāstra tradition, short aphoristic verses often catalog interpersonal strategies relevant to courtly life, diplomacy, and counsel. This verse reflects a broader early Indian political-ethical literature that classifies human dispositions and associates each with a conventional mode of approach, consistent with pragmatic advisory genres circulating in premodern South Asia.

Persuasion is presented as disposition-dependent: material inducement corresponds to greed, deferential gesture to rigid pride, agreeable alignment to folly, and truthful speech to learning. The framing functions as a descriptive taxonomy of rhetorical means rather than a universal moral principle.

Key terms are compact and socially coded: 'añjalikarma' denotes a formalized gesture of respect (añjali), signaling hierarchy and appeasement; 'chanda' commonly indicates inclination or pleasure, so 'chando'nuvṛtti' implies accommodating preference; 'yathārthatva' emphasizes correspondence with reality, aligning the learned (paṇḍita) with discourse grounded in accurate meaning.