HomeChanakya NitiCh. 5Shloka 5

Shloka 5

Family and Relationships — Chanakya Niti

निःस्पृहो नाधिकारी स्यान् नाकामो मण्डनप्रियः ।

नाविदग्धः प्रियं ब्रूयात्स्पष्टवक्ता न वञ्चकः ॥

niḥspṛho nādhikārī syān nākāmo maṇḍanapriyaḥ |

āvidagdhaḥ priyaṁ brūyāt spaṣṭavaktā na vañcakaḥ ||

One without desire is unfit for office; one without aims loves no adornment; one without shrewdness speaks no pleasing words; one who speaks plainly is no deceiver.

निःस्पृहःdesireless; without longing
निःस्पृहः:
TypeAdjective
Rootनिःस्पृह
Formपुंलिङ्ग; प्रथमा; एकवचन
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
Formनिपात
अधिकारीone in authority; eligible person
अधिकारी:
TypeNoun
Rootअधिकारी
Formपुंलिङ्ग; प्रथमा; एकवचन
स्यात्should be; may be
स्यात्:
TypeVerb
Root√अस्
Formविधिलिङ्; प्रथमपुरुष; एकवचन
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
Formनिपात
अकामःwithout desire
अकामः:
TypeAdjective
Rootअकाम
Formपुंलिङ्ग; प्रथमा; एकवचन
मण्डनप्रियःfond of adornment
मण्डनप्रियः:
TypeAdjective
Rootमण्डनप्रिय
Formपुंलिङ्ग; प्रथमा; एकवचन
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
Formनिपात
अविदग्धःunskilled; uncultured
अविदग्धः:
TypeAdjective
Rootअविदग्ध
Formपुंलिङ्ग; प्रथमा; एकवचन
प्रियम्what is pleasing; pleasant words
प्रियम्:
TypeNoun
Rootप्रिय
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग; द्वितीया; एकवचन
ब्रूयात्should speak
ब्रूयात्:
TypeVerb
Root√ब्रू
Formविधिलिङ्; प्रथमपुरुष; एकवचन
स्पष्टवक्ताa clear speaker
स्पष्टवक्ता:
TypeNoun
Rootस्पष्टवक्तृ
Formपुंलिङ्ग; प्रथमा; एकवचन
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
Formनिपात
वञ्चकःdeceiver; cheat
वञ्चकः:
TypeNoun
Rootवञ्चक
Formपुंलिङ्ग; प्रथमा; एकवचन
Chanakya (Kautilya)
अनुष्टुप्
Ancient EthicsPolitical HistorySanskrit LiteratureHistorical Philosophy
Office-holder (adhikārī)Courtly societySpeech and rhetoricEthical character-types

FAQs

In the broader nītiśāstra milieu, such verses function as compact observations about courtly and administrative life, where motivation (kāma/aspiration), strategic speech, and the management of appearances are treated as socially consequential traits within hierarchical institutions and royal courts.

The verse frames desire/aspiration (spṛhā/kāma) as a marker associated with participation in office and public roles, implying that complete disinterest is traditionally viewed as incompatible with the pursuit and maintenance of authority within an administrative setting.

The construction uses paired negatives (na…/nā…) to set up aphoristic equivalences, and it juxtaposes social performance (maṇḍana, ornament/adornment) and speech-ethics (spaṣṭavaktṛ vs. vañcaka) to classify character-types; the phrasing suggests a period idiom in which rhetorical clarity is contrasted with deception as mutually exclusive traits.